You are watching: Why does sony vegas take so long to render
I have an i7 8700k 4.3 ghz 16gb tridentz rgb 3200 mhz ram 2070 rtx gepressure graphics card. I render at 2560x1440p and it takes a 30-40 minutes video 50 ish minutes however as soon as i render a 30 secs clip via rsmb it take literally 30 minutes. I dont understand why. Let me recognize if you have actually any type of suggestions. I use Main idea Avc to encode. 44,000,000 bitrate i think. audio on 320,000 bitrate. not sure on the other settings, reasoning of this off the peak of my head.Let me understand if you have a solution!!
I have actually an i7 8700k 4.3 ghz 16gb tridentz rgb 3200 mhz ram 2070 rtx geforce graphics card. I render at 2560x1440p and it takes a 30-40 minutes video 50 ish minutes however when i render a 30 seconds clip via RealSmart Motion Blur it take literally 30 minutes. I dont understand also why. Let me recognize if you have actually any kind of suggestions. I use Key principle Avc to encode. 44,000,000 bitrate i think. audio on 320,000 bitrate. not sure on the other settings, thinking of this off the height of my head.Let me understand if you have a solution!!
Sony acquired right into a tiff via nvidia years back, and hasn"t had decent nvidia assistance because the 500 series. Also, the programs usage different algorithms and also code to perform the work-related. Sony functions far much better via the means Radeons work-related, not so well making use of Cuda. Just as AutoCad functions better on intel/nvidia than it does on amd/amd. That all changed through Magix Vegas, which supplies Cuda far mor efficiently.
See more: Why Do Demons And Ghouls Stay Together ? Why Demons And Ghouls Stay Together
Amd and also nvidia carry out things slightly differently, very same as Intel and amd are not the exact same cpu, even though the end result is similar. Android and Apple the same, different.As a repercussion, the code composed has a tendency to favor one procedure or the other. AutoCad offers Cuda cores more properly than gflops, so nvidia cards are better. Sony and also nvidia had a corpoprice worry years back, so the end result was incredibly little participation as soon as the gtx600 series came out. Inreliable motorists. So the gflops consumption by amd was much superior. This continued all the same way approximately SVP 14 I believe. After that, Vegas readjusted and is now Magix Vegas, not Sony Vegas. Magix went straight to nvidia as it"s initially resource, even more ppl own/buy nvidia cards like Quattro"s etc, so that was a money decision.So depending on if you have actually Sony Vegas or Magix Vegas, functioning via a nvidia gpu is either fairly crappy performance or excellent performance. Due to the fact that you sassist Sony Vegas, running an nvidia card and also having actually concerns is pretty a lot a provided. If utilizing Magix Vegas and also nvidia, that"s a entirety various story.