I can be reached at

What is the difference between the adhering to as soon as referring to telephone calls?

Please call me on this number. You can reach me on this number.

You watching: I can be reached at

Please contact me at this number. You have the right to reach me at 0088000900.

Please call me through this number. You deserve to reach us through this number.

Are they interchangeable? Which one would certainly sound more organic and also accurate?


*

Please speak to me on this number. You have the right to reach me on this number. Acceptable everywhere, principally supplied in UK/Australia/New Zealand. Sounds starray to North Amerihave the right to ears, but construed.

Acceptable all over, principally supplied in US/Canada. Might sound starray to jiyuushikan.org speakers external North America, however widely interpreted.

Please call me via this number. You have the right to reach us through this number.

Generally offered once the caller will certainly need to stop to an intermediary before being associated to the desired party (such as once a receptionist answers all incoming calls). Not primarily supplied once the number connects straight to the desired party (which is "DID" Direct Inward Dial in The United States and Canada, and "DDI" Direct Dial-In elsewhere).


*

To my Amerideserve to ear, "at" sounds the a lot of organic, "through" is much less widespread, and "on" is one I would certainly never use.

See more: Download Mode Samsung Galaxy S3 Download Mode, How To Enter Download Mode On Samsung Galaxy S3

The only way I would usage "through this number" is if I had actually more than one number, I can say "You deserve to reach me via 547-2146" to indicate that I"m less likely to be easily accessible at the various other numbers. But in basic I"d usage "through" when referring to a perkid or area, not number:

You can reach me with my sister.

You deserve to reach me with the office.

which would suppose I can not be through my sister / at the office, but if you call them they will connect you to me.


*

*

I think that all 3 instances are interchangeable. Coming from a background of Amerihave the right to and also Australian jiyuushikan.org none of them stand also out as any clearer or more natural than one more. I think that it"s ssuggest a issue of personal choice based on where you are from; a exercise of extremely simple colloquialisms. For example if someone shelp to me "Hit me up on this number." I would certainly understand simply the exact same.


*

I"m pretty certain I"ve heard on offered, yet hardly ever, and also, I am specific, by folks whose basic use of the jiyuushikan.org language pays little bit heed to the idea of what is or isn"t appropriate. Use of at yet comprises 99 plus percent of what I"ve viewed or heard , or offered myself, throughout all parts of the United States, and also also comes in variations such as "reach me at" or "I"ll be at". Never have I well-known anyone to usage through in this means though. And no surpclimb tbelow, as the word means an intermediary and appears therefore injudicious.


At or On are both reasonably common ( in the UK at least ). "You can speak to me at 0800999999" is interchangeable with "You deserve to speak to me on 0800999999". The "at" might have a slight suggestion that it might be a work-related number, and I might not be there.

See more: Difference Between Windows Xp And Windows 7, Difference Between Windows 7 And Windows Xp

Through is just really provided linked with "reach me" - so "you have the right to reach me via 0800999999". Not as common in the UK, and it implied that someone else will aswer, yet can pass on a message. It would not suggest that you can necessarily speak to the perboy - for this reason the "reach me" rather than "call me".


Highly energetic question. Earn 10 reputation in order to answer this question. The reputation necessity helps defend this question from spam and also non-answer task.
site architecture / logo © 2021 Stack Exadjust Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa. rev2021.4.6.38996


Your privacy

By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exreadjust can keep cookies on your tool and disclose indevelopment in accordance through our Cookie Policy.